Summary of Aletkina's case against Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto), MERGER, a 'Military-Political and Criminally-Commercial System' of mass killing in the courts (under continuous edition)

ATTENTION: The site is under construction, all pages subject to modification during 2016-2017. But there are already many documents published, to access them, uncollapse the menu items having "+" sign: "ALETKINA v HSC and MERGER +", it will allow to see sub-menues and documents. The sub-menu items have names (short versions): "Supreme Court of Canada, File 36521... +" , and "Supreme Court of Canada, File 36871 +". Uncollapse them to see pubished documents.

INSTRUCTION TO OPENING THE PDF DOCUMENTS' OUTLINES (BOOKMARKS) FOR EASY NAVIGATION: On the left top corner of the pfd document click on a small icon "Toggle sidebar", then click on the second appeared icon there "Show document outline" - you will be able to navigate the document by the Tab. Numbers, containing brief description of the document.

 

INTRODUCTION TO THE PROBLEM

SCC Judges Thomas Albert Cromwell, Rosalie Silberman Abella, Andromache Karakatsanis, Russell Brown, Clement Gascon, Alexandra Hoy (ACJO), Jean L. MacFarland, Peter D. Lauwers, Lois B. Roberts; John I. Laskin, Katherine van Rensburg, David M. Brown; Grant Huscroft; Eleanore A. Cronk; David L. Corbett ; Alison Harvison Young, master Barbara McAfee, master Joan M. Haberman, MPP Sophie Kiwala, ONCA Registrar Sandra Theroulde, ONCA ex-Senior Legal Officer John Kromkamp, ONCA current Senior Legal Officer Alison Warner, ONCA Special Counsel – Office of Chief Justice of Ontario Jascob Bakan, SCC Registrar Roger Bilodeau, SCC Case Analyst Francois Desrosiers, Law Help Ontario – Litigation Coordinator Mathew Hogan, CanLII Manager, Content and Partnerships - Sarah Sutherland; Lawyers BLG LLP Melanie Warner, Kate Dearden, Stephanie Young acted to contravene Acts of Parliament, committed criminal offences against administration of justice, acted as a criminal group to eliminate Rule of Law, Charter, Covenant for destruction of Aletkina's life via depletion of her human, civil, political rights. Their decisions/actions prove so called "friendly fascism" (Bertram Gross), or, as Aletkina called it, MERGER of the state powers with corporations, that de-facto set a fascist environment where civil society is managed in the interest only of the elites, not in the interest of the Laws, citizens, humans, people of Canada. The number of Statutes and the law cases, contravened by then exceeds 20! The Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada refused to interfere; the Canadian Judicial Council refused to deal with them as a 'criminal organization' and said it requires separate complaints on each involved judge. The Ontario Attorney General instructed to bring allegations of criminal offences of all listed above to the RCMP. RCMP said they will not investigate the judges, although I set an issue of existence of a criminal organization, composed of the judges, legal officers, court registrars, politicians, government... The hospitals, the doctors, the healthcare industry as a whole, operating within a MERGER, jointly with the 'judges and corporations' deny care, deny diagnosing, treating, and commit physical violence against ill person.

A. Ontario courts 'only open to the rich,' judge warns. [Chief Justice of Canada has spoken a verdict: in Canada, there is not justice for poor [and disabled, ill, unfrepresented, unwanted truth and judtice seekers] A

B. Rogue Corts in Canada Trample Self-Represented Litigants. [Sec. 15 of the Charter is a myth] B

C. Who is judging the judges? [Supreme Court of Canada is the biggest threat to Canadian democracy]

D. What we talk about when we talk about fascism - Michael's essay D

"Michel Enright cited Bertram Gross"Friendly Fascism" that explores the nexus between corporations and government. Gross argues that collusion between Big Business and Big Government can create a fascist environment where civil society is managed in the interest only of the elites. He says fascism will not ride in on a white horse, followed by legions of armed militia. It will come gradually, silently even, in the unfolding of seemingly disparate events at high corporate and government levels."--------- I and Viktorija Topper in our materials in the SCC proved a criminal MERGER of the state powers and corporations, that set "a fascist environment" to serve elite, and to eliminate any human, civil and political right. We proved existence of a military-political and criminally-commercial system of mass murder of innocent people in the courts.http://www.judgethejudges-canada.ca/index.php/action-of-aletkina/supreme-court-of-canada-file-2/rec-vol-vii-affid-of-v-topper; http://www.judgethejudges-canada.ca/index.php/action-of-aletkina/supreme-court-of-canada-file-2/application-for-leave-to-appeal-file-36871; http://www.judgethejudges-canada.ca/index.php/action-of-aletkina/supreme-court-of-canada-file-2/rec-vol-xi-reconsidetation-motion-record-for-all-scc-applications

WHY the court of appeal has created a need for appeal in the SCC? WHY the SCC contravened so many Statutes and case laws? Among many, there are the following reasons:

1. Aletkina, an expert, Ph. D. in Chemistry, is a witness of the 'criminal organization' formed by the 'justice system participants' pursuing a criminal offences against public safety, public order and administration of law and justice. Aletkina, while working in the Hosptal for Sick Children in Toronto, witnessed that the Hospital was creating conditions for accommodating potential terrorists, providing strangers of unverified identity with access to the chemical inventory of explosive substances and to the confidential research and business infrmation. When Aletkina protested and complained on safety and confidentiality issues, her employment was terminated. When she filed Application (under OHSA and ESA) to the Ontario Labour Relations Board in 2003, her application was unlawfully dismissed. When she filed her legal action in Superior Court in the end of the 6-year "old" limitations period", in one month she became profoundly mentally ill. In the end of 2011, after recovery from profound stage of mental illnes to a chronic one, she resumed litigation, and all (with few exceptions) judges started acting against Aletkina, against all relevant case law and Statutes that benefitted Aletkina and making "findings" that conflicted with the proven by exhibits facts. Aletkina have presented to the ONCA (Laskin, Hoy)) and to the SCC (Abella) proofs that even CanLII site's administration was biased and partial against Aletkina and removed from teh CanLII database all 6 necessary for Aletkina case ofr preparing and filing the Book of Authorities. The CanLII  Justice system asministration comitted criminal affence against administration of law and justice, to disadvantage Aletkina, to victimize her. See pages 93-125 in Records-Volume IV, TAb. 10 [http://www.judgethejudges-canada.ca/index.php/action-of-aletkina/supreme-court-of-canada-file-2/rec-vol-iv-1-tabs-1-20k].

Until this crimial offence is not investigated, and until the RCMP's full-list disclosure on investigation is delivered to Alekina, and until the court hears the criminal case "Aletkina and Crown v. MERGER (criminal organization of the 'justice system participants'), Aletkina is considered a victim of so called "justice system"=criminal organization, ske cannot trust the 'justice system", all legal proceedings have to be STAYED and all orders made by such criminal organization cannot have any validity, cannot be enforced in any way.

The Hospital was promoting the "physician-assited death" and the judges and the courts' and CanLII's administration were committing criminal offences, promoting the "judiciary-assisted death/terrorism" and a murder of the key expert witness.  The case has been formed by the hospital and the courts as "MERGER OF PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED & JUDICIARY-ASSISTED DEATH/TERRORISM. EXECUTION OF THE KEY EXPERT WITNESS"

2. Judge G. Huscrotf, the most right-wing and anti-Charter judge in Canada, patently biased and partial, was secifically appointed by the leadership of the 'criminal organization' to hear Aletkina's motion for directions to psychological assessor of Aletkina;s capacity, for appointment of PGT, for permssion to file TIMELY served leave motion materials. He had a task set before him by the 'organization', to destroy Aletkina. Huscroft was dependable, not independent. He was new, recently appointed to teh ONCA by Harper, and he was appnted via violation of sec. 3 of the Statute of the Judges Act.  [http://www.lawtimesnews.com/201501124403/headline-news/galati-questions-appointment-of-law-prof-to-appeal-court], [http://www.ontariocourts.ca/coa/en/judges/huscroft.htm].

The JUDGES ACT, sec. 3 [http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/J-1/page-1.html#h-3] says:

Eligibility for appointment

3 No person is eligible to be appointed a judge of a superior court in any province unless, in addition to any other requirements prescribed by law, that person (a) is a barrister or advocate of at least ten years standing at the bar of any province; or(b) has, for an aggregate of at least ten years, (i) been a barrister or advocate at the bar of any province, and (ii) after becoming a barrister or advocate at the bar of any province, exercised powers and performed duties and functions of a judicial nature on a full-time basis in respect of a position held pursuant to a law of Canada or a province.

Huscroft was appointed by Harper in direct violation of the Judges Act; Prior to appointment, Huscroft: (a) was NOT a barrister or advocate of at least ten years standing at the bar of any province; or(b) has NOT, for an aggregate of at least ten years, (i) been a barrister or advocate at the bar of any province, and (ii) after becoming a barrister or advocate at the bar of any province, exercised powers and performed duties and functions of a judicial nature on a full-time basis in respect of a position held pursuant to a law of Canada or a province.

3. Huscroft was assigned to hear Aletkina's motion because he is the most right-wing and anti-Charter judge in Canadabroke so many laws, made findings conflicting with the facts, and made decisions, conflicting with the laws. Aletkina plead allegations of Huscroft's bias and partiality, and all following judges in the court of appeal and in the SCC, as well as the Registrars and the Senior Legal Officers in ONCA and SCC "work hard" to punish Aletlina exemparily, despite that the allegations are proven by the facts, evidences abd the law.

SUMMARY OF FACTS

4. On September 9, 2016, the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada, Roger Bilodeau, dismissed 1 Aletkina's Motion for Recosodertion of the SCC decisions in Applications, Files 36521, 386871 and New Un-numbered Application (timely filed on April 15, 2016). To the Registrar's opinion, the Reconsideration Motion "did not reveal the exceedingly rare circumstances which would warrant reconsidertion..."

See Aletkina's Amended Argument for the Reconsideration Motion, and see what kind of issues, exceedingly rare circumstances, Aletkina has brought, and please make your own opinion whether or not the issues are reality ground, have merits, have wxtreme public interest and consitutute exceedingly rare circumstances to warrant Reconsideration [http://www.judgethejudges-canada.ca/index.php/action-of-aletkina/supreme-court-of-canada-file-2/rec-vol-xi-reconsidetation-motion-record-for-all-scc-applications] .

Also, see Aletkina's Amended Memorandum for The SCC Apliction for leave to appeal, File 36521 [http://www.judgethejudges-canada.ca/index.php/action-of-aletkina/scc-file-36521/application-of-n-aletkina-for-leave-to-appeal-36521], [http://www.judgethejudges-canada.ca/index.php/action-of-aletkina/scc-file-36521/css-36521-record-to-stay] , File 36871 [http://www.judgethejudges-canada.ca/index.php/action-of-aletkina/supreme-court-of-canada-file-2/application-for-leave-to-appeal-file-36871], File New, from Amended Orders of Huscroft and Laslin, vanRensburg, Brown [http://www.judgethejudges-canada.ca/index.php/action-of-aletkina/scc-file-36521/new-application-from-amended-orders-of-huscroft-and-laskin-e-al]. The "New File" was filed on April 15, 2016, timely, 60 days after the Amended Orders were delivered to Aletkina (delivered on Feb. 12, 2016), and considering that Aletkina was released by the ophthalomologist from doing any legal work since November 30, 2015 till February 12, 2016. All of them had the same and / or overlappig issues, and, based on the sec. 107 of the Courts of Justice Act [https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90c43#BK145], they should have been consolidated in one, with extension of time for filing. But due to the group of the SCC judges Gascon, Abella, Karakatsanis, Brown, Cromwell and the SCC Registrar Bilodeau consolidation, cobining was denied was denied twice [http://www.judgethejudges-canada.ca/index.php/action-of-aletkina/all-scc-orders, Tabs. 4, 14, 15, 16], and Aletkina was consciousely victimized by them.

SCC judge Cromwell and SCC Registrar treated the New Application (from amended orders) as part of File 36521, vexatiously called it "vexatious" and returned.

5. Civil action "Nadejda Aletkina v. Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto)" in the Ontrio Superior Court of Justice, File CV-10-407042, initially was a civil legal action of ALEKINA, a self-represented disabled Plaintiff, against her ex-employer.

During a series of proccedings within this action, N. Aletkina acted as a plaintiff and a witness of the state powers' crimes classified in Criminal Code of Canada Part II - Offences Against Public Order, sections 46, 79, 80, 81; potentially Part. II.1 Terrorism; Part IV sec. – Offences Against Administration of Law and Justice, incl. sec. 126, 128, 131, 132, 134, 137, 138, 139, 141, 181, 217, 218, 219, 221, 224, 229, 231, 239, 672, and sec. 46 in respect to Canada’s criminal activity abroad violating international laws [and genocide of native population in foreign lands].

(1) MERGER OF ALL STATE POWERS FOR MASS MURDER OF THE VICTIMS AND WITNESSESS OF THEIR CRIMES  HAS FORMED, A  MILITARY-POLITICAL & CRIMINALLY-COMMERCIAL SYSTEM / ORGANIZATION in Canada, permitting, accommodating, coordinating, legalizing and conducting the acts of terrorism, mass murders, genocides, execution of unwanted persons: ill, disabled, children and women, families, nations, countries, races, witnesses of the elite’s crimes etc. and extortion of the victims’ lands, property and extortion of the funds and properties of the victims, incl. globally

(2) MERGER OF PHYSICIAN –ASSISTED AND JUDICIAL-ASSISTED DEATH TO PROMOTE TERRORISM; EXECUTION OF WITNESS

6. The justice system participants (sec. 2, Criminal Code) formed a MILITARY-POLITICAL & CRIMINALLY-COMMERCIAL ORGANIZATION / SYSTEM (criminal organization – sec. 2, Criminal Code), it produced to the Applicant abundance of the first class evidences of its existence and criminal activity, incompatible with holding public offices and with their formal public mandates, and the participants now
face the choice: resignation, imprisonment, or extermination of Aletkina, the witness who is exposing their crimes. This constitutes an
extremely rare circumstance of this proceeding (judges=criminals ).


7. The participants of the criminal organization: Involved in contravening the Acts of Parliament, acting contrary to the mandate: Masters (2), judges (total 17 corrupted judges), Registrars (2-ONCA, SCC), Senior Legal Officers and Special Counsels (3), CJO Strathy, MP (1), CJC (1), MPP (1), Municipal executives (2), Ontario and Federal Ministers and Ombudsmans (3), health practitioners (8) =TOTAL 40 persons proved themselves as the participants. Extremely rare circumstance.


8.
The Acts of Parliament, contravened to by the participants of the criminal organization within non-trial/pre-trial proceedings: Rule 7 of the Rules of Civil Procedure; Sec. 105, 106, 107, 121, 137.1 of the CJA; Limitations Act – sec. 7; Criminal Code: Sec. 46, 79, 80, 81, 83.14, full Part IV – Offences against the administration of Law and Justice, incl. 126, 128, 131, 132, 134, 137, 138, 139, 141, 181, 217, 218, 219, 221, 224, 229, 231, 239, 672, and sec. 46 in respect to Canada’s criminal activity abroad violating international laws, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, UN Resolution on Rights of Persons with Disabilities; UN Resolution on Prevention of Abuse of Women’s Rights, Charter. Extremely rare circumstance.


9.
The involved judges-participants (perpetrators) who contravened the Acts of Parliament within non trial / pre-trial proceedings are: Judges Thomas Albert Cromwell, Rosalie Silberman Abella, Andromache Karakatsanis, Russell Brown, Clement Gascon, Alexandra Hoy (ACJO), Jean L. MacFarland, Peter D. Lauwers, Lois B. Roberts; John I. Laskin, Katherine van Rensburg, David M. Brown; Grant Huscroft; Eleanore A. Cronk; David L. Corbett ; Alison Harvison Young, master Barbara McAfee, master Joan M. Haberman. There were masters and judges who DID NOT contravene the Acts of Parliament, were not biased, not partial: Master Ronald Dash, Judges Susan G. Himel, Charles T. Hackland, Theodore Matlow, Frances P. Kiteley, Harry LaForme (6). The ratio of participants to non-participants is 40:6. The judges Matlov and Hackland resigned/retired immediately after delivering a just and fair decision (forced by the criminal organization to resign / retire? By who?). It is an extremely rare circumstance.


10.
The trial will involve the Acts of Parliament: Occupational Health and Safety Act. Proven by the Records of Applicant – Volume X, Tab. D1, para. 41 on page 40 (it also was before Gascon J.in the Hospital’s RESPONSE to application 36521). As a result, will involve sec. 7 of the Charter.


11.
The Trial will also involve the Employment Standards Act, re: Equal pay and benefits for equal work. Proven implicitly in Rec. of Appl. – Vol. X, Tab. D1 paras. 7- 19 at pages 37 – 40. In para. 17 says “accepted, under protest” – includes protest against ESA violation - unequal pay and benefits for equal work.


12.
Case Law 626381 Ontario Ltd. V. Kagan, Shastri, 2013 ONSC 4114 (CanLII) – key important. The justice Stinson cited constitutional lawyer Hogg that the Constitutional/ Charter review of the orders is applicable where the crown is the party, or in private proceeding where the Statutes are involved.In Aletkina's case several Statutes are involved.


13.
The above said in paras. 3-7 means that the orders in Aletkina’s non-trial / pre-trial proceeding (and in future trial) are qualified for Constitutional/ Charter review.


14.
The above means that the Supreme Court of Canada judges Judges Thomas Albert Cromwell, Rosalie Silberman Abella, Andromache Karakatsanis, Russell Brown, Clement Gascon and the Registrar by their decisions proved their being the participants in the 'criminal organization' and acting contrary to their mandate, contravene Acts of Parliament, destroy the Rule of Law, eliminate the Charter rights, pursue a criminal numeral offencespunishable by PArt IV of the Criminal Code.


15.
The above stated conclusion means that the SCC is a center force of the MILITARY-POLITICAL & CRIMINALLY-COMMERCIAL SYSTEM, permitting, accommodating, coordinating, legalizing, conducting the acts of TERRORISM, mass murders, genocides, execution of witnesses and extortion of the funds and properties of the victims and witnesses, domestically in Canada, and globally (as proven by V. Topper in Rec. Vol. IV, tab D, Rec. Vol. VII, and Rec. Vol. VIII. Extremely rare circumstance.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Aletkina filed three Applications for Leave to Appeal - File 36521 was filed on July 17, 2015; File 36871 was timely filed on February 21, 2016; New (Un-numbered yet) file was timely filed on April 15, 2016.

All three files were arbitrarily (means unjustly, unlawfully - not based on the Law, nor on the facts) dismissed, as well as the Motion for Reconsideration of three Applications was also dismissed based on the Registrar's some kind of a 'satisfaction', not based on the Statute Law, not on the facts, without maliciously formulated by the Registrar grounds for dismissal.

All three files are inseparable, titghtly interrelating to each other; relared to the matters of the judges contravening the Acts of Partliament (punishable based on sec. 126(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada, breaking the Statute Laws, the case laws and violating teh Charter and the international laws.

The set of the Documents posted under File 36871 are covering the matters of all three applications the fullest.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATTENTION: The site is under construction, all pages subject to modification during 2016-2017. But there are already many documents published, to access them, uncollapse the menu items having "+" sign: "ALETKINA v HSC and MERGER +", it will allow to see sub-menues and documents. The sub-menu items have names (short versions): "Supreme Court of Canada, File 36521... +" , and "Supreme Court of Canada, File 36871 +". Uncollapse them to see pubished documents.

INSTRUCTION TO OPENING THE PDF DOCUMENTS' OUTLINES (BOOKMARKS) FOR EASY NAVIGATION: On the left top corner of teh pfd document click on a small icon "Toggle sidebar", then click on teh second appeared icon there "Show document outline" - you will be ablet o navigate the document by the Tab. numbers, containing broed description of the document.